IMO bureaucracy

Tagged: 

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #153484
    Ami Desai
    Participant

    In many deals the Integration Management Office becomes a reporting layer instead of a decision hub. In your experience, what makes an IMO truly effective rather than bureaucratic? am especially interested in practical ideas on mandate, structure, and how to connect the IMO to real synergy delivery.

    #153824
    SamirA
    Participant

    Give the IMO real authority, allow them to be a decision engine rather than just a reporting layer. Structure is also key, keep it lean, senior and embedded, the IMO should sit in the flow of execution, not above it. Action and Value, tracking and reporting are great but active tracking, action performing and value creating from reporting; if reports don’t trigger anything for the IMO he/she shouldn’t maybe be in that position. Lastly, culture is key they should promote accountability, encourage transparent reporting and reward teams for delivering synergies.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Are you sure you
want to log out?

In order to become a charterholder you need to complete one of the IMAA programs