[Sarah]

Traditionally, due diligence is viewed as a process for identifying risks and potential deal breakers. Financial, legal, tax, commercial, and HR due diligence are often focused on uncovering liabilities that could impact valuation or transaction structure.

However, in many successful acquisitions, due diligence also plays an important role in identifying value creation opportunities. Examples include revenue synergies, procurement savings, operational efficiencies, cross-selling opportunities, and talent acquisition benefits. In some cases, understanding these opportunities may be just as important as identifying risks.

This raises an interesting question for M&A practitioners:

Should due diligence spend more effort assessing value creation opportunities, or should its primary purpose remain risk identification and mitigation?

In your experience or opinion:

Which DD workstream is best positioned to identify value creation opportunities?
How should buyers balance risk assessment against synergy evaluation?
Can excessive focus on synergies lead to deal mistakes?

I look forward to hearing different perspectives from the community.

[Author]

Posts